Key result
Genetic testing improves diagnostic yield and personalized risk assessment for sudden cardiac events.
Why the study?
Conventional risk stratification methods are usually inadequate for identifying individuals at high risk for sudden cardiac events, especially those without visible structural heart disease.
Genetic testing, including single-gene panels, whole-exome sequencing, whole-genome sequencing, and polygenic risk scores, enhances diagnostic yield and personalized risk stratification for sudden cardiac events.
Genetic testing may augment conventional SCD stratification; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Sudden cardiac events are the leading cause of death worldwide. Conventional risk stratification methods, which largely depend on clinical history, imaging, and electrocardiography, are usually inadequate for identifying high‐risk individuals, especially those without visible structural heart disease. Through genetic testing, personalized medicine has been revolutionized by enabling the identification of single‐gene variants, population‐specific polymorphisms, and polygenic risk factors that promote susceptibility to arrhythmia. Inherited channelopathies, such as long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, as well as cardiomyopathies, are characterized by strong genotype–phenotype correlations, allowing more accurate prediction of arrhythmia risk. Single‐gene panels, whole‐exome sequencing (WES), whole‐genome sequencing (WGS), and polygenic risk scores (PRS) are not mutually exclusive; rather, they can be used together to enhance diagnostic yield and risk stratification. Screening of relatives of affected individuals enables the early identification of asymptomatic carriers. Moreover, the combination of clinical, imaging, and molecular data supports individualized risk assessment. The next steps emphasize the integration of multiomics, variant interpretation using artificial intelligence, and the creation of ancestry‐specific genetic repositories, which will facilitate predictive and preventive approaches to cardiology. This review describes current genetic testing approaches for sudden cardiac events, their use in personalized risk assessment, and the potential of personalized medicine to lower the risk of sudden cardiac death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verma et al. (2026) conducted a review in Sudden cardiac events. Genetic testing was evaluated. Genetic testing approaches, including single-gene panels and polygenic risk scores, enhance diagnostic yield and personalized risk assessment for sudden cardiac events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: