The research identifies how various marketing roles influence tech venture performance, suggesting strategic combinations improve outcomes.
While existing research has examined how founders’ marketing experience and the presence of a Chief Marketing Officer relate to the performance of tech-based ventures, we broaden this perspective by studying how these roles may be complemented or substituted by early marketing managers and marketing employees. Relying on a configurational approach, we acknowledge that multiple distinct combinations of marketing positions across levels of an organizational hierarchy may be positively associated with the performance of tech-based ventures. We employ fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), complemented by qualitative interviews and regression analysis, to identify these high-performing combinations. Drawing on a longitudinal sample spanning Crunchbase, LinkedIn, and Compustat data on 1,791 tech-based ventures over six years, we find that no single marketing level is necessary for funding and market-related performance. Instead, we identify six configurations associated with high funding volumes and five associated with a high number of covered markets. Across these configurations, marketing management appears to be the most consistently influential role, appearing in most high-performing combinations and demonstrating strong positive effects in our complementary regression analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nitzsch et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: