Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study estimates ash and sulfur dioxide emissions in a volcanic eruption, highlighting assessment methods.
Explosive eruptions require rapid, observation-constrained estimates of ash and sulfur dioxide emissions for hazard assessment. We analyze the 23 November 2025 Hayli Gubbi eruption (Afar, Ethiopia) with WRF-Chem v4.8 and use backward trajectories seeded within TROPOMI aerosol index and sulfur dioxide ( \(SO_2\) ) plumes to reconstruct time- and height-resolved source terms. The trajectory-derived ash source term, scaled to 0.8 Mt, captures the main ash transport corridor and the timing of the coarse-mode enhancement observed by AERONET at Nizwa University (Oman). For \(SO_2\) , a manually prescribed time-height scenario improves agreement with the TROPOMI plume relative to the first trajectory-based approximation. The simulation captures the large-scale \(SO_2\) plume geometry and shows moderate agreement with aerosol optical depth and aerosol middle height. The corresponding \(SO_2\) emission is \(≈\) 0.15 Mt. About 6% of the fine ash deposits within 28 h, including fallout to the southern Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. This study demonstrates a rapid, observation-constrained reconstruction for a single-eruption case study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ukhov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: