Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved navigation safety in multi-UAV systems, highlighting the impact of intelligent decision-making.
This paper is concerned with cooperative multi-UAV navigation in a planar obstacle environment. A hierarchical embodied swarm framework with leader, subleader, and follower roles is proposed. At the high level, a passable-corridor-driven decision layer is developed to perform split–merge reconfiguration and navigate/encircle mode switching. At the low level, a multi-term force synthesis controller is constructed for formation maintenance, inter-agent collision avoidance, obstacle avoidance, and sub-swarm cohesion. To accommodate both rule-based and local large language model (LLM) decisions, a feasibility projection operator is introduced so that only kinematically admissible structural actions are executed. In addition, a LiDAR-based obstacle-repulsion term and an occlusion-attenuated attraction mechanism are incorporated to improve navigation safety in cluttered environments. A Lyapunov analysis of the smooth controller core further certifies that, for a known (possibly time-varying) cruise velocity compensated by feedforward, the formation tracking error is uniformly bounded by the initial energy. Finally, multi-seed numerical simulations verify the proposed framework in standard, ablated, and complex scenarios. In the hardest alternating-gate scenario, the LLM-assisted variant raises mission success from 0.000 to 0.100, increases the goal-reaching ratio from 0.025 to 0.125, and reduces the mean terminal error from 44.738m to 39.851m, showing the value of semantic high-level reconfiguration under tight passage constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: