Typological analysis reveals critical constraints on absolute rights creation in patent transactions, impacting contractual freedom.
The statutory typification of absolute rights in patent transactions has received limited attention in Chinese academic discourse. While the principle of numerus clausus (a closed list of real rights) does not directly apply to patent law, the creation of new types of absolute rights within this domain is nonetheless subject to significant legal constraints. A typological analysis of absolute rights in the patent system reveals significant constraints on their contractual creation. Paradoxes arising from the contractual creation of absolute rights demonstrate that existing legal provisions fail to substantiate the erga omnes effect of licenses and therefore fail to justify contractual freedom in defining absolute rights. Even under the principle of party autonomy, the distinctive features of patent transactions indicate that the absence of statutory typification of absolute rights would lead to increased transaction costs, compromised transaction security, and undue restrictions on third-party conduct.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang Yi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: