Retrospective case-control study evaluating therapeutic hypothermia's impact on neurological recovery post-ECPR, suggesting neuroprotective benefits.
Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) improves survival in refractory cardiac arrest but neurological recovery remains a key unmet challenge. Therapeutic hypothermia (TH, 32–34 °C) provides neuroprotection by reducing cerebral metabolism and mitigating ischemia–reperfusion injury, yet evidence from Asian populations, especially Taiwan, China, is limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study (2015–2023) at a tertiary medical center in central Taiwan, China. Among 218 refractory OHCA patients undergoing ECPR, 82 received TH and 136 received standard care (No-TH). TH was delivered via surface or intravascular cooling for 24–36 h, followed by controlled rewarming. Primary outcomes were survival (in-hospital), neurological status at discharge [Cerebral Performance Category, CPC], and bleeding complications. Logistic regression and group comparisons (χ2/t-test) identified predictors of survival and favorable neurological outcome. Results: The ECPR+TH group demonstrated significantly higher survival and greater CPC 1–2 proportion (favorable neurological outcome) than No-TH (both p < 0.01). Bleeding events showed no significant difference (p = 0.287). Multivariable analysis indicated TH as an independent predictor of improved neurological outcomes (β = –0.578, p = 0.001). Poorer CPC scores correlated with longer CPR duration, higher APACHE II scores, bleeding, comorbidities, and shock indices. Conclusion: ECPR combined with TH improves survival and neurological recovery (CPC 1–2) without increasing bleeding risk. These data support early TH integration in ECPR protocols as a neuroprotective strategy prioritizing quality of survival, not survival alone. Prospective multicenter validation is needed to optimize cooling selection, timing, and rewarming precision in Asian cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
YU YU TU (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: