Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot evaluation demonstrates potential of language models to enhance patient understanding in oncology.
Complex medical jargon describing procedures, medications, and care notes have long posed a barrier for patients when it comes to understanding their personal medical information, impacting critical outcomes such as adherence to post-discharge care directives or overall patient literacy. With this issue in mind, there is a motivation to make clinical notes more accessible and readable for patients, while maintaining accuracy of the contained medical information. Thus, large language models (LLM) have been identified as a potential solution thanks to their ability to generate text based on given prompt at high speed based on a corpus of training data, outperforming any human summarizer. But what does it mean to make clinical notes “patient friendly” and is establishing a universal definition possible? This research uses LLMs to explore a potential definition for “patient friendly” medical summaries, using a MIMIC-IV-Ext-BHC dataset based on 270,033 free-text clinical notes from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2008—2019. Several LLMs were trained on this dataset and tasked with generating a “patient-friendly” summary that prioritized the following elements: 1) explanation of the patient’s medical condition 2) actionability of text for medication or post-discharge care and 3) prevention information . Afterwards, LLM-generated summaries were preference ranked against each other and physician-generated summaries in a double-blind study, with participants ranking their preferred summaries on a scale of 1—10. Our findings suggest that LLMs could play a pivotal role in improving patient literacy on a broader scale, without necessitating upfront financial and labor costs that would otherwise be burdensome for overworked, understaffed healthcare facilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oanh Li-Huy Nguyen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: