Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines air quality outcomes linked to urban forest phenology in northern China, suggesting tailored greening strategies.
Urban forests are widely promoted for improving air quality, yet their effectiveness is typically assessed through static green-space indicators that ignore seasonal variation in vegetation activity. This limitation is especially consequential in cold-region cities, where winter heating-season pollution peaks coincide with the leaf-off period of deciduous trees. Using a monthly panel of 15 centrally heated cities in northern China (2015–2024; N = 1464), this study develops a phenology-aware framework integrating three indicators: effective forest capacity (EFC), which combines dynamic forest area with a sigmoid leaf-on share and city-specific evergreen fraction; heating-season exposure (HI); and a binary phenology–heating mismatch (PHM) flag. City–year–month fixed-effects models show that the EFC–PM2.5 association is directionally negative but statistically inconclusive under conservative inference (city-clustered SE: p=0.523; wild bootstrap: p=0.541), whereas associations with SO2 and O3 are statistically robust. The central empirical contributions are the four-quadrant heterogeneity analysis and the topographic paired comparison: four-quadrant heterogeneity analysis reveals that forest capacity shows clearer negative associations in dry semi-humid cities, whereas HI dominates in heating-dominated plain cities. A paired topographic comparison between Urumqi and Xining illustrates how terrain-induced inversions can override forest signals. The results support differentiated urban greening strategies that coordinate forest expansion with heating-system transition, evergreen species planning, and ventilation-sensitive urban design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: