Assesses data cleaning methods to enhance modal parameter tracking in SHM, suggesting improved anomaly detection accuracy.
Vibration-based Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) exploits automated Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) to track changes in modal parameters over time for subsequent statistical pattern recognition and anomaly detection. However, weak excitation, measurement noise, non-stationarities, non-linearities, and model inaccuracies can jeopardize the reliability of automated OMA and pollute the modal parameter time series with a number of outliers or spurious estimates. These have an impact on statistical pattern recognition and consequently, the anomaly detection accuracy. Thus, a preliminary data cleansing to enhance the robustness of modal parameter tracking is imperative to ensure the reliability of SHM outcomes. Clustering techniques represent an attractive solution to automatically identify underlying data patterns and discriminate possible spurious results. However, the curse of dimensionality is often an issue in the application of such techniques to time series of experimentally identified modal parameters. To mitigate this issue and, at the same time, the computational efforts, the present study proposes an innovative approach leveraging clustering techniques coupled with mode-pairing constraints for robust and automatic tracking of modal parameters in the context of vibration-based SHM applications. Different clustering algorithms have been embedded in the proposed data processing strategy and applied to a real dataset collected on a full-scale structure under operational conditions. The comparative performance assessment demonstrated how DBSCAN outperforms other clustering methods in the context of the proposed approach, allowing the effective separation of the physical poles from the spurious ones even in the presence of closely spaced modes and highly polluted feature space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rainieri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: