Key result
Higher baseline serum eosinophils are linked to ~110% greater clinical remission on severe asthma biologics.
Why the study?
Clinical remission is an emerging treatment goal in severe asthma, and easily accessible predictors such as serum biomarkers are needed to guide therapy.
Do serum biomarkers predict the achievement of clinical remission in patients with severe asthma?
Systematic Review (n=4,250)
Do serum biomarkers predict the achievement of clinical remission in patients with severe asthma?
Odds Ratio: 2.1
Serum eosinophil count is the most consistent predictor of clinical remission in severe asthma, with periostin serving as a secondary biomarker.
Higher eosinophils may predict remission on biologics in severe asthma; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding care.
Background: Clinical remission is an emerging, ambitious treatment goal in severe asthma, characterized by sustained absence of symptoms and exacerbations, and normalization of lung function while off or on minimal treatment. Easily accessible predictors are needed to guide therapy. Serum biomarkers represent promising candidates. Objective: To systematically review and synthesize the evidence on the association between serum biomarker levels and the achievement of clinical remission in patients with severe asthma. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to October 2025 for observational studies and clinical trials reporting serum biomarkers and a predefined clinical remission outcome in severe asthma. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: 18 studies (n=4,250 patients) were included. Key biomarkers studied were serum eosinophil count (sEOS), periostin, IgE, and a limited number of emerging markers, including soluble IL-5 receptor α (sIL-5Rα). Higher baseline sEOS was consistently associated with a greater likelihood of achieving remission on biologic therapy; across studies, reported ORs for sEOS ranged from approximately 1.5 to 2.9, with a narrative summary estimate of about 2.1. Serum periostin showed a modest positive association, while total IgE was not consistently predictive. Evidence for IL-5 and IL-13 cytokines themselves was scarce, whereas soluble IL-5 receptor α (sIL-5Rα) showed the most promising emerging signal, although based on only a few studies. Conclusion: Current evidence supports serum eosinophil count as the most consistent predictor of clinical remission in severe asthma, with periostin as a secondary biomarker. Evidence for IL-5 and IL-13 remains limited, while sIL-5Ra appears promising but requires further validation. Standardized definitions of remission and prospective validation are required for clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Long et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in severe asthma (n=4,250). Serum biomarkers (including eosinophil count and periostin) was evaluated on clinical remission (OR ~2.1). Higher baseline serum eosinophil count was consistently associated with a greater likelihood of achieving clinical remission on biologic therapy in severe asthma (narrative summary OR ~2.1).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: