Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates fiscal support impacts on collective economies in frontier villages, suggesting effective policy optimization.
This study evaluates the impact of fiscal support policies on village-level collective economies in Province S, a frontier region in China. Using panel data from 2195 administrative villages (6585 village-year observations) spanning the period before, during, and after policy implementation, we construct a “policy empowerment–resource matching–governance synergy” framework and employ two-way fixed effects, instrumental variables, heterogeneity analysis, and mediation models. The results show that (1) fiscal support significantly increases village collective income by about 7%, a finding that is robust to endogeneity and various checks; (2) the policy works better for mid-to-distant suburban villages, those without collective land, villages with pre-policy income below 50,000 yuan, and villages that adopted models of land transfer, high-standard farmland, equity dividends, specialty agriculture, or factory leasing, confirming resource matching; (3) the policy operates through increased project net returns, social capital, farmer participation, and multi-departmental coordination, validating governance synergy. This study provides micro-evidence from a frontier region and practical insights for optimizing fiscal support policies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: