Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates angiopet-2's efficacy in brain delivery, suggesting strong potential for glioma therapy.
Brain tumor therapy remains limited by the blood–brain barrier (BBB), which restricts drug access. BBB‐penetrating peptides offer a promising strategy for delivering therapeutic and diagnostic payloads. Angiopep‐2 is a well‐established vector, yet novel radioconjugates based on this vector remain of interest. We report the synthesis and evaluation of DOTA‐Angiopep‐2 for radiolabeling with Lutetium‐177 ( 177 Lu) and Terbium‐161 ( 161 Tb). Notably, 177 Lu serves as a β‐ and γ‐emitter, whereas 161 Tb is an Auger and β‐emitter; both are utilized in therapy and SPECT imaging. Peptides were synthesized via solid‐phase peptide synthesis. Cytotoxicity assays in T98 glioblastoma cells showed that Angiopep‐2 is well‐tolerated, maintaining ~100% viability at 20 μM and a moderate decline up to 100 μM. Radiolabeling achieved yields > 95% with excellent radiochemical stability at room temperature for up to 10 days and moderate stability in the presence of human serum. Biodistribution in healthy CFW mice showed a brain‐associated radioactivity of 0.24% ± 0.05% IA/g at 5 min p.i. and a 12‐fold increase in the brain‐to‐blood ratio (0.028–0.339) by 60 min p.i. These results support DOTA‐Angiopep‐2 as a versatile platform for radionuclide delivery and a potential candidate for future glioma‐targeted studies. Further studies in tumor‐bearing models are ongoing to evaluate therapeutic efficacy and translational potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fotou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: