Key result
Right axillary mini-incision matches inferior mini-sternotomy with 100% ASD repair success but increases early pain.
Why the study?
Limited-access surgical repair remains important for adults with large ASDs unsuitable for transcatheter closure, prompting a comparison of early outcomes between inferior mini-sternotomy and right axillary vertical mini-incision.
Does right axillary vertical mini-incision compared to inferior mini-sternotomy improve early outcomes in adults undergoing surgical repair of large ASDs?
Cohort (n=79)
No
Does right axillary vertical mini-incision compared to inferior mini-sternotomy improve early outcomes in adults undergoing surgical repair of large ASDs?
Both inferior mini-sternotomy and right axillary vertical mini-incision are safe and effective for large ASD repair without aortic cross-clamping, though the axillary approach is associated with greater early postoperative pain.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both mini-incisions yield comparable early outcomes for large ASD repair in adults; leaves open optimal selection pending randomized trials.
Limited-access surgical repair remains important for adults with large atrial septal defects (ASDs) when transcatheter closure is unsuitable. This research aimed to compare early outcomes of inferior mini-sternotomy and right axillary vertical mini-incision for large ASD repair under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) without aortic cross-clamping. This retrospective study included 79 adults from January 2020 to January 2024. Based on surgical approaches, patients were divided into Group A ( n = 40, inferior mini-sternotomy) and Group B ( n = 39, right axillary vertical mini-incision). Operative variables, postoperative recovery, pain scores, complications, costs, and 3-month follow-up findings were compared. All patients underwent successful repair without perioperative death, conversion, reoperation, major residual shunt, stroke, or low-output syndrome. Operative time, CPB duration, transfusion volume, duration of tracheal intubation, ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization cost, and myocardial injury markers were comparable between groups. Group B had higher pain scores on postoperative days 2 and 3 ( P < 0.05). Pulmonary infection, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and phrenic nerve palsy occurred only in Group B, whereas superficial wound infection, sternal malunion, and hypertrophic scar or keloid occurred only in Group A; most complication differences were not statistically significant. During 3-month follow-up, no death, reoperation, major residual shunt, cerebrovascular event, or severe rhythm-related event was observed. Both approaches enabled safe early large ASD repair on-pump CPB without aortic cross-clamping. Right axillary vertical mini-incision offered better scar concealment but greater early pain and pulmonary-management demands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Large atrial septal defects (n=79). Right axillary vertical mini-incision vs. Inferior mini-sternotomy was evaluated on Surgical success (complete ASD repair without large residual shunt, low-output cardiac syndrome, cerebrovascular accident, severe rhythm-related complication, or reoperation). Both right axillary vertical mini-incision and inferior mini-sternotomy achieved 100% surgical success for large atrial septal defect repair, though the axillary approach caused greater early postoperative pain.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: