Key result
Multi-layered outreach linked to a ~22% increase in cardiac stress test completion versus baseline.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the impact of a multi-layered intervention on improving cardiac stress test scheduling and completion rates by reducing scheduling barriers.
Does a multi-layered outreach intervention improve rates of cardiac stress test scheduling and completion in primary care patients?
Observational (n=705)
Does a multi-layered outreach intervention improve rates of cardiac stress test scheduling and completion in primary care patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 81% vs 66.2%
p-value: p=0.00008
A multi-layered outreach intervention significantly improves the scheduling and completion rates of cardiac stress tests ordered in primary care.
Supports outreach to raise completion rates; hypothesis-generating pending randomized trials.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a multi-layered intervention on improving rates of cardiac stress test scheduling and completion by reducing barriers to scheduling. METHODS: Using a nonrandomized mixed-methods pre-post design, we identified patients for whom a stress test was ordered in primary care but had not been scheduled within 4 weeks. The first intervention consisted of proactive outreach phone calls by a primary care patient service representative for test scheduling. The second intervention consisted of priming phone calls to patients, which served as a reminder to schedule their appointment and an invitation to participate in a brief, semi-structured interview to understand barriers to test scheduling. Changes in scheduling rates and completion rates were analyzed using hypothesis tests, and time to completion was analyzed using X-bar/S charts. RESULTS: Compared with the baseline cohort (n = 157), patients in the intervention cohort (n = 548) completed their stress tests at a significantly higher rate (66.2% [104] baseline; 81.0% [444] intervention; p = .00008). Patients in the intervention cohort similarly scheduled their tests at an improved rate (70.1% [110] baseline; 91.2% [500] intervention). Time to test completion was also significantly reduced in the intervention group (44.70 days [σ = 72.93] baseline; 33.6 days [σ = 26.67] intervention). Interviews revealed that patients had trouble scheduling their tests due to a lack of time and confusing processes. CONCLUSIONS: A multi-layered outreach intervention was successful in improving the rates of completion and scheduling for cardiac stress tests, as well as reducing time to completion. The pilot was found to be cost-effective, but may increase workload for primary care staff. Future studies should investigate ways to automate processes to reduce the burden on the system. Our study describes a potentially quality-improving intervention by introducing a new scheduling process, which is not the existing standard of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amat et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Unscheduled cardiac stress tests (n=705). Multi-layered outreach intervention (proactive outreach and priming phone calls) vs. Baseline cohort (standard care) was evaluated on Cardiac stress test completion rate (p=0.00008). A multi-layered outreach intervention significantly improved cardiac stress test completion rates compared to baseline (81.0% vs 66.2%; p=0.00008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: