Key result
Aspirin monotherapy during VA-ECMO shows no difference in major bleeding or thrombosis versus other antiplatelet strategies.
Why the study?
DAPT after PCI increases bleeding risk in patients requiring VA-ECMO for AMI–cardiogenic shock, and evidence guiding optimal antithrombotic strategies in this population is limited.
Does aspirin monotherapy prevent in-stent thrombosis and reduce major bleeding compared to augmented or no antiplatelet therapy in patients with AMI-cardiogenic shock requiring VA-ECMO and PCI?
Observational (n=72)
No
Does aspirin monotherapy prevent in-stent thrombosis and reduce major bleeding compared to augmented or no antiplatelet therapy in patients with AMI-cardiogenic shock requiring VA-ECMO and PCI?
Absolute Event Rate: 33.3% vs 48%
p-value: p=0.396
In patients with AMI-cardiogenic shock on VA-ECMO after PCI, aspirin monotherapy may provide adequate protection against stent thrombosis while potentially minimizing bleeding risk compared to augmented antiplatelet therapy.
Aspirin monotherapy yielded no overt stent thrombosis in VA-ECMO PCI; leaves open safety confirmation in randomized trials.
Background Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting is standard of care but increases bleeding risk, particularly in patients requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for acute myocardial infarction–cardiogenic shock. Evidence guiding optimal antithrombotic strategies in this high-risk population remains limited. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study at a high-volume ECMO center. From January 2018 to December 2022, 351 VA-ECMO patients were screened, and 72 who underwent PCI immediately prior to or during ECMO were included. Patients were grouped by initial post-PCI antiplatelet strategy: aspirin alone (n = 33), augmented therapy (n = 25), or no antiplatelet therapy (n = 14). The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an aspirin-only strategy for preventing in-stent thrombosis. Efficacy was assessed by the incidence of in-stent thrombosis during ECMO hospitalization, and safety was assessed by the occurrence of major bleeding events. Results Groups were similar in age, race, gender, and BMI. No patient developed clinically overt in-stent thrombosis. Major bleeding occurred in 33.3% of aspirin, 48% of augmented, and 50% of no-antiplatelet patients (p = 0.396). Most common bleeding events were hemoptysis, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions Among patients undergoing PCI with concurrent VA-ECMO support, no differences in stent thrombosis or major bleeding were observed between aspirin monotherapy, augmented antiplatelet therapy, or no antiplatelet therapy. However, intracranial hemorrhage occurred more frequently in the Augmented AP group. These findings suggest that aspirin monotherapy may provide adequate protection against stent thrombosis while potentially minimizing bleeding risk in this critically ill population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chowdhury et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock requiring VA-ECMO (n=72). Aspirin monotherapy vs. Augmented antiplatelet therapy or no antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Incidence of in-stent thrombosis and occurrence of major bleeding events during ECMO hospitalization (p=0.396). Aspirin monotherapy in patients on VA-ECMO after PCI showed no in-stent thrombosis and a 33.3% rate of major bleeding, compared to 48% with augmented and 50% with no antiplatelet therapy (p=0.396).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: