Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates smoke control methods in subway entrance passageways, indicating optimized arrangements improve safety during fires.
Smoke spread from concourse fires into long entrance passageways can threaten evacuation in deep-buried subway stations, especially when smoke moves upward along inclined escalator sections. This study used a 1:8-scale Fire Dynamics Simulator model to investigate smoke control in a concourse connected to two long entrance passageways. Concourse-only smoke exhaust, conventional combined smoke exhaust, different passageway vent configurations, and an optimized near-source concentrated arrangement were compared. The baseline concourse extraction rate failed to prevent smoke from entering the passageways. At a heat release rate of 15.55 kW, smoke was nearly prevented from entering landing I only when the concourse extraction rate was increased to six times the baseline value. Under conventional combined exhaust, the passageway extraction capacity was distributed between landing I and landing II, but smoke still entered escalator section I. When the total extraction rate of each single-side passageway was unchanged, concentrating the extraction capacity at landing I allowed smoke to be extracted before entering escalator section I. The optimized arrangement prevented smoke from entering escalator section I under both centered and right-offset fire source conditions for the tested passageway geometry, heat release rate, and extraction-rate conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: