Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates the dynamics of risk valuations, highlighting the importance of time consistency in financial products.
A crucial issue in a dynamic framework is how risk valuations at different times are interrelated. In this regard, the notion of time consistency was widely introduced and discussed in the literature. A time-consistent dynamic valuation states that a future payoff preferred to another payoff at some future time point should already be preferred to this payoff today. This paper aims to construct a time-consistent, dynamic version of the Three-step method introduced in Deelstra et al. ((2020). ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , 50(3), 709–742.) for hybrid life Pure Endowment products, employing a backward iteration scheme. The backward scheme is illustrated in a dual-iteration approach using a Pure Endowment product without profit sharing. Furthermore, we explore the continuous-time limit of the backward scheme, incorporating profit-sharing into the Pure Endowment to investigate a hybrid life payoff. Our analysis demonstrates that the presence of the diversifiable component undermines the time-consistency of the dynamic three-step method. Consequently, the time-consistent price of the actuarial part shows a notable increase. To address this, and in accordance with Devolder and Lebègue ((2016). Risks , 4(4), 49.), we present a reduced time-consistent variant by decreasing the safety loads in each iterative step of the backward scheme.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belhouari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: