Why the study?
Hemodynamics-based thrombosis models often ignore the effect of thrombus breakdown induced by elevated shear stress.
Does incorporating a shear stress-induced thrombus breakdown function improve the accuracy of predicted thrombus formation and growth in computational models?
Does incorporating a shear stress-induced thrombus breakdown function improve the accuracy of predicted thrombus formation and growth in computational models?
Incorporating shear stress-induced thrombus breakdown into computational hemodynamics models significantly improves the accuracy of predicting thrombus volume and evolution in complex geometries like aortic dissection.
Refined thrombus modeling may enhance computational predictions in aortic dissection; leaves open translation to clinical use pending human validation.
Thrombosis is a complex biological process which involves many biochemical reactions and is influenced by blood flow. Various computational models have been developed to simulate natural thrombosis in diseases such as aortic dissection (AD), and device-induced thrombosis in blood-contacting biomedical devices. While most hemodynamics-based models consider the role of low shear stress in the initiation and growth of thrombus, they often ignore the effect of thrombus breakdown induced by elevated shear stress. In this study, a new shear stress-induced thrombus breakdown function is proposed and implemented in our previously published thrombosis model. The performance of the refined model is assessed by quantitative comparison with experimental data on thrombus formation in a backward-facing step geometry, and qualitative comparison with in vivo data obtained from an AD patient. Our results show that incorporating thrombus breakdown improves accuracy in predicted thrombus volume and captures the same pattern of thrombus evolution as measured experimentally and in vivo. In the backward-facing step geometry, thrombus breakdown impedes growth over the step and downstream, allowing a stable thrombus to be reached more quickly. Moreover, the predicted thrombus volume, height and length are in better agreement with the experimental measurements compared to the original model which does not consider thrombus breakdown. In the patient-specific AD, the refined model outperforms the original model in predicting the extent and location of thrombosis. In conclusion, the effect of thrombus breakdown is not negligible and should be included in computational models of thrombosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: