Why the study?
After infrainguinal endovascular treatment for peripheral arterial disease, it remains uncertain whether single or dual antiplatelet therapy should be preferred.
Does dual antiplatelet therapy reduce major adverse limb events and major adverse cardiovascular events compared to single antiplatelet therapy in patients after infrainguinal endovascular treatment for peripheral arterial disease?
Does dual antiplatelet therapy reduce major adverse limb events and major adverse cardiovascular events compared to single antiplatelet therapy in patients after infrainguinal endovascular treatment for peripheral arterial disease?
Dual antiplatelet therapy does not significantly improve overall MALE or MACE compared to single antiplatelet therapy after infrainguinal endovascular treatment for PAD, but may reduce MALE in patients undergoing below-the-knee interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports SAPT post-infrainguinal EVT for PAD; leaves open DAPT benefit in below-the-knee subgroups.
After infrainguinal endovascular treatment for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), it is uncertain whether single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) should be preferred. This study investigated major adverse limb events (MALE) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between patients receiving SAPT and DAPT. Patient data from three centers in the Netherlands were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All patients treated for PAD by endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral, popliteal, or below-the-knee (BTK) arteries and who were prescribed acetylsalicylic acid or clopidogrel, were included. End points were 1-, 3-, and 12-month MALE and MACE, and bleeding complications. In total, 237 patients (258 limbs treated) were included, with 149 patients receiving SAPT (63%) and 88 DAPT (37%). No significant differences were found after univariate and multivariate analyses between SAPT and DAPT on 1-, 3-, and 12-month MALE and MACE, or bleeding outcomes. Subgroup analyses of patients with BTK treatment showed a significantly lower 12-month MALE rate when treated with DAPT (hazard ratio 0.33; 95% confidence interval 0.12–0.95; p = 0.04). In conclusion, although patient numbers were small, no differences were found between SAPT and DAPT regarding MALE, MACE, or bleeding complications. DAPT should, however, be considered over SAPT for the subgroup of patients with below-the-knee endovascular treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ipema et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: