Key result
Upfront investment procedures cut median J-CTO scores by ~50%, driven by reduced proximal cap ambiguity.
Why the study?
Although modification procedures improve subsequent CTO PCI success after failure, the anatomical impact and mechanism of benefit have never been systematically studied.
Does a planned investment procedure reduce occlusion complexity and improve morphology in high-risk coronary chronic total occlusions?
Population
First 80 consecutive patients returning for completion of CTO PCI
Comparison
Baseline angiographic characteristics prior to investment vs start of completion procedures
Design
Substudy of the Invest-CTO study
Authors
Loading...
May simplify high-risk CTO anatomy for staged PCI; leaves open need for randomized trials on success.
Cohort (n=80)
Does a planned investment procedure reduce occlusion complexity and improve morphology in high-risk coronary chronic total occlusions?
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 4%
p-value: p=<.001
A planned investment procedure in high-risk CTO PCI significantly reduces angiographic occlusion complexity and facilitates subsequent wire crossing.
Øksnes et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in chronic total occlusion (CTO) (n=80). upfront investment procedure vs. baseline prior to investment was evaluated on J-CTO score (p=<.001). An upfront investment procedure significantly reduced the median J-CTO score from 4 to 2 (P<0.001) and decreased proximal cap ambiguity from 77.5% to 12.5% in high-risk CTOs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: