BIA400 versus Ponto Wide: a long-term retrospective analysis of implant stability, tolerability and survival in bone conduction devices.

Key Result

BIA400 and Ponto Wide bone conduction devices were compared for long-term implant stability, tolerability, and survival, but specific clinical findings are unavailable in the abstract.

Key Points

• This research compares the long-term stability, tolerability, and survival rates of two bone conduction devices: BIA400 and Ponto Wide.
• Retrospective analysis of data on implant stability and tolerability between BIA400 and Ponto Wide devices.
• Long-term follow-up to assess survival rates of both devices.
• Findings on implant stability and tolerability favor either BIA400 or Ponto Wide based on collected long-term data.
• Survival rates were assessed, providing insight into the longevity of both devices.