Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Data on the prevalence trend and clinical outcomes of hypertensive urgency and emergency during the COVID-19 pandemic remains limited. Hence, we aim to compare the prevalence of hypertensive urgency and emergency between the years 2019 and 2020 and compare the clinical outcomes between both years. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample (2019-2020) to obtain all patients with hypertensive urgency (ICD-10: I160) and emergency (ICD-10: I161). We excluded all patients who tested positive for COVID-19 infection. We measured the trends annually in 4 quarters. Multivariate logistic regression was used to measure the adjusted outcomes. Results: We found a total of 188,801 patients with hypertensive urgency (2019: 95,731 - 2020: 93,070) and 112,257 patients with hypertensive emergency (2019: 55,456 - 2020: 56,801). The trend in hypertensive urgency showed a significant drop in the second and fourth quarters of the year 2020 (p<0.01), Figure 1 . On multivariate logistic regression, the in-hospital mortality odds among hypertensive emergencies were higher in the year 2020 (aOR 1.08, 95%CI [1.01-1.15]) with no difference in hypertensive urgency. Other complications included hemorrhagic shock, ischemic stroke and acute kidney injury (AKI) were worse among hypertensive emergencies in the year 2020, Figure 1 . There were no differences in the length of stay in both years, regardless of the severity of hypertension. Conclusion: Hypertension urgency was less in the second and fourth quarters in the year 2020. The overall in-hospital complications were worse for hypertensive emergencies in the year 2020 including mortality, hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke and AKI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashem et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: