Compares physicochemical attributes and consumer acceptance of floodplain and upland cocoa in Brazil, indicating unique production benefits.
BACKGROUND: Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) from the Brazilian Amazon plays an important role in national production. While most cocoa is cultivated in upland systems, floodplain ecosystems represent a traditional and distinct production environment that may influence bean composition and quality. This study characterizes floodplain cocoa (FC) and compares it with upland cocoa (UC) from the eastern Amazon. RESULTS: FC fruits had an oval shape and thick husks, with smaller beans than UC, both well fermented. FC beans had higher fiber content (17.70 ± 0.7 g/100 g dry matter (DM)) and total polyphenols (27.04 ± 0.69 mg CE/g DM), but lower protein content (14.99 g/100 g DM) and antioxidant capacity (627.45 ± 30.99 μmol TE/g DM) compared to UC beans (fiber: 14.57 ± 0.40 g/100 g DM; protein: 16.44 g/100 g DM; polyphenols: 14.19 ± 4.19 mg CE/g DM; antioxidant capacity: 1112.58 ± 56.47 μmol TE/g DM). FC beans showed higher levels of caffeine and theophylline, and a theobromine/caffeine ratio typical of Criollo cocoa. Chocolates from both exhibited favorable attributes, including fine-flavor notes, and were similarly accepted by consumers. CONCLUSION: FC and UC beans exhibited distinct physicochemical profiles, both showing adequate fermentation and similar consumer acceptance, highlighting the potential of Amazonian cocoa for product differentiation and valorization of regionally distinct systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: