Cross-sectional study assesses fall risk perception among oncohematology triads, suggesting improvement strategies.
BACKGROUND: Falls are preventable adverse events in hospitalized oncology populations. PURPOSE: To determine agreement in perceived fall risk among oncohematologic patients, caregivers, and nurses within 72 hours of admission. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 university hospitals involving patient-caregiver-nurse triads. The primary outcome was perceived fall risk assessed with the St. Thomas Risk Assessment Tool in Falling Elderly Inpatients. RESULTS: A total of 126 triads (378 assessments) were analyzed. Overall agreement was moderate (72.2%; k = 0.573). "History of falls" showed almost perfect agreement (93.7%; k = 0.824). "Patient agitation" showed fair agreement (k = 0.280), whereas "visual impairment" and "frequent toileting/toilet assistance" showed no significant agreement. Pairwise concordance ranged from 79.4%-83.3% (k = 0.536-0.607), with the highest agreement between caregiver and nurse. CONCLUSIONS: Overall agreement was moderate, with the highest agreement for history of falls. Standardizing interpretation and incorporating multidimensional assessments may improve fall risk identification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabrera-Jaime et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: