Explores the ORR mechanism in dual-atom catalysts, indicating significant implications for energy conversion applications.
Synergistic effects inherent to dual-atom catalysts (DACs) constitute a promising strategy for boosting the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), yet the underlying regulatory mechanism─especially for heteronuclear DACs incorporating d-block and p-block metal centers─remains elusive. Herein, we investigate the ORR mechanism on Fe (d-block)–Sn (p-block)–N 6 –C catalysts via density functional theory (DFT) calculations under the IEFPCM solvation model, focusing on spin-state dependence, active-center specificity, and the pivotal role of H adsorption sites. Our calculations demonstrate that O 2 adsorption at the Sn active center triggers pronounced O–O bond elongation, which substantially reduces the kinetic barrier for direct O–O dissociation; notably, this dissociation barrier is minimized to a mere 0.44 eV in the high-spin state ( S = 2). Additionally, the single Sn active center selectively promotes the 4 electron (4e – ) pathway toward H 2 O, whereas both the 4e – and 2e – electron pathways are accessible at the single Fe active center and Fe,Sn dual active centers. Critically, ORR selectivity is strictly governed by the H adsorption site during H 2 O 2 formation: H binding to the Fe-side N site favors the 2e – pathway yielding H 2 O 2, while H adsorption at the Sn site directs the reaction toward the 4e – pathway producing H 2 O. More remarkably, we construct a set of integrated descriptors derived from spin-regulation parameters, including band gap, spin magnetic moment, interfacial charge transfer, and metal atomic charge. These innovative descriptors establish robust structure–property correlations, laying a rigorous theoretical framework for the rational design of heteronuclear DACs in electrochemical energy conversion, environmental remediation, and advanced synthetic chemistry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: