Globalpeace Campus and New Renaissance i = E = MC² — Art, Consciousness, Architecture and Holistic Information Theory as a Model of an Evolutionary Peace Culture

This study investigates the relationship between art, architecture, consciousness research, creativity, neuronal resonance, and social evolution through the projects “Globalpeace Campus” and “New Renaissance i = E = MC²”. The theoretical foundation of the study is the Holistic Information Theory (GIT) developed by Dieter W. Liedtke, which interprets information as the fundamental principle underlying energy, matter, consciousness, and evolution. At the center of the investigation stands the Hegel-Liedtke Art Formula as a visual instrument for representing innovation, creativity, and evolutionary information development. Art is therefore understood not merely as an aesthetic object, but as a biologically, culturally, and socially active informational system. The study connects approaches from art history, neurobiology, epigenetics, architecture, perception research, and information science. It examines to what extent creative and innovative informational processes may influence neuronal, epigenetic, and societal development. The Globalpeace Campus is described as a model of episystemic bioarchitecture in which architecture, landscape, audiovisual media, art, and science merge into open spaces of consciousness and creativity. The study concludes that information, creativity, and innovation can be interpreted as interconnected evolutionary processes and that art may play a central role in the development of consciousness, health, peace, and social evolution. Introduction The projects “Globalpeace Campus” and “New Renaissance i = E = MC²” aim to combine art, science, architecture, consciousness research, and social development within a unified interdisciplinary framework. The starting point is the assumption that information does not merely represent abstract signs or data, but rather forms the fundamental structure of energy, matter, consciousness, and biological evolution. At the center of this approach stands the formula: The formula interprets information (“i”) as the fundamental structure behind energy and matter and extends classical physical perspectives through an informational approach. Based on this concept, the Holistic Information Theory (GIT) attempts to connect quantum mechanics, relativity theory, consciousness research, biological evolution, neurobiology, and art history within a common informational structure. The exhibition “New Renaissance i = E = MC²” documents the development of innovation in art, society, and science through key works and historical artistic series. A central element of the investigation is the Hegel-Liedtke Art Formula, which distinguishes between already known elements (yellow) and objectively new innovations (red). This creates a simplified visual system for representing creative developmental processes. The art formula presents itself as a universal graphic language for innovation, creativity, and consciousness development. Its purpose is to make creative processes intuitively visible and understandable independently of language, culture, or educational background. The study further examines how perception, creativity, and innovative information may influence neurobiological and epigenetic processes and investigates the role of architecture, colors, spatial structures, and audiovisual environments in consciousness, health, and societal development. The Globalpeace Campus in Uruguay expands these concepts into architectural space. Architecture is interpreted not merely as a functional structure, but as an open space for consciousness, research, and creativity integrating art, nature, audiovisual media, and social interaction. The study additionally compares the Hegel-Liedtke Art Formula with early universal symbolic systems such as Sumerian cuneiform writing, the Chinese I Ging hexagrams, and the Yin-Yang symbol. It investigates whether the art formula may be interpreted as a simplified universal visual language for innovation and evolutionary processes. The research understands creativity, innovation, and consciousness development as interconnected informational processes and investigates art as a possible evolutionary medium of biological, cultural, and societal development. Studies Museum, Art 1. Fancourt, D.; Finn, S. (2019)What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being?WHO Health Evidence Network Synthesis Report 67DOI/Link:WHO Report Arts and Health 2. Clift, S. et al. (2020)The Role of the Arts in Improving Health and Well-BeingDOI: 10.18261/issn.2535-7913-2020-01-08 3. Daykin, N. et al. (2018)The impact of participation in performing arts on adolescent healthDOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.03.005 4. Stuckey, H.; Nobel, J. (2010)The Connection Between Art, Healing, and Public HealthDOI: 10.1177/1936724410386959 5. Bolwerk, A. et al. (2014)How Art Changes Your BrainDOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101015 6. Chatterjee, A. (2014)The Aesthetic BrainISBN: 9780199811809 7. Skov, M.; Nadal, M. (2020)Art and the BrainDOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817872-9.00001-1 8. Leder, H. et al. (2004)A Model of Aesthetic Appreciation and Aesthetic JudgmentsDOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj1704_1 9. Freedberg, D.; Gallese, V. (2007)Motion, Emotion and Empathy in Esthetic ExperienceDOI: 10.1017/S0140525X07001934 10. Pelowski, M. et al. (2017)The Emotional and Cognitive Impact of Viewing ArtDOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00594 Resonanz 11. Rizzolatti, G. et al. (1996)Premotor Cortex and the Recognition of Motor ActionsDOI: 10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0 12. Gallese, V. et al. (1996)Action Recognition in the Premotor CortexDOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1996)4:6<593::AID-HBM5>3.0.CO;2-6 13. Iacoboni, M. et al. (1999)Cortical Mechanisms of Human ImitationDOI: 10.1126/science.286.5449.2526 14. Umiltà, M. A. et al. (2001)I Know What You Are DoingDOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00337-3 15. Buccino, G. et al. (2001)Action Observation Activates Premotor and Parietal AreasDOI: 10.1111/1460-9568.00133 16. Rizzolatti, G.; Craighero, L. (2004)The Mirror-Neuron SystemDOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 17. Keysers, C.; Gazzola, V. (2010)Social Neuroscience and Shared CircuitsDOI: 10.1038/nrn2805 18. Decety, J.; Jackson, P. (2004)The Functional Architecture of Human EmpathyDOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.10.013 19. Ramachandran, V.; Hirstein, W. (1999)The Science of ArtDOI: 10.1080/026432999380520 20. Gallese, V. (2011)Neuroaesthetics and Embodied SimulationDOI: 10.1017/S0140525X10003260 Neuroplastizität 21. Kandel, E. R. (2001)The Molecular Biology of Memory StorageDOI: 10.1126/science.294.5544.1030 22. Kandel, E. R. (2012)The Age of InsightISBN: 9781400068715 23. Draganski, B. et al. (2004)Neuroplasticity: Changes in Grey MatterDOI: 10.1038/427311a 24. Maguire, E. A. et al. (2000)Navigation-related Structural Change in Taxi DriversDOI: 10.1073/pnas.070039597 25. Kempermann, G. et al. (1997)More Hippocampal Neurons in Enriched EnvironmentsDOI: 10.1038/386493a0 26. van Praag, H. et al. (2000)Neural Consequences of Environmental EnrichmentDOI: 10.1038/35044558 27. Diamond, M. C. et al. (1964)Environmental Enrichment and Brain DevelopmentDOI: 10.1126/science.146.3644.610 28. Lövdén, M. et al. (2010)Experience-dependent Plasticity of White MatterDOI: 10.1038/nrn2896 29. Park, D. C. et al. (2014)Sustained Engagement and Cognitive FunctionDOI: 10.1177/0956797613499592 30. Zatorre, R. et al. (2012)Plasticity in Gray and White Matter During LearningDOI: 10.1038/nn.3045 Epigenetik 31. Meaney, M.; Szyf, M. (2005)Environmental Programming of Stress ResponsesDOI: 10.1196/annals.1333.022 32. Weaver, I. et al. (2004)Epigenetic Programming by Maternal BehaviorDOI: 10.1038/nn1276 33. McEwen, B. (2007)Physiology and Neurobiology of Stress and AdaptationDOI: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2006 34. Champagne, F. (2010)Epigenetic Influence of Social ExperienceDOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.03.003 35. Cole, S. (2014)Human Social GenomicsDOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004601 36. Slavich, G.; Cole, S. (2013)Social Signal Transduction Theory of DepressionDOI: 10.1037/a0035302 37. Bick, J.; Nelson, C. (2016)Early Experience and Brain DevelopmentDOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.030 38. Jiang, S. et al. (2019)Epigenetic Modifications in Stress Response GenesDOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.01.025 39. Miller, G. et al. (2009)Psychological Stress and the Human Immune SystemDOI: 10.1037/a0015851 40. Epel, E. et al. (2004)Stress and Telomere ShorteningDOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407162101 Architektur 41. Sternberg, E. (2009)Healing Spaces: The Science of Place and Well-BeingISBN: 9780674028302 42. Mallgrave, H. F. (2010)The Architect’s BrainISBN: 9781409402534 43. Eberhard, J. (2009)Brain Landscape: The Coexistence of Neuroscience and ArchitectureISBN: 9780195382884 44. Coburn, A. et al. (2017)Buildings, Beauty, and the BrainDOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00381 45. Vartanian, O. et al. (2013)Impact of Ceiling Height and Contour on Beauty JudgmentsDOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901227107 46. Banaei, M. et al. (2017)Walking Through Architectural SpacesDOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00477 47. Ulrich, R. (1984)View Through a Window May Influence Recovery from SurgeryDOI: 10.1126/science.6143402 48. Küller, R. et al. (2009)The Impact of Light and Colour on Psychological MoodDOI: 10.1080/00038620902751104 49. Salingaros, N. (2015)Biophilia and Healing EnvironmentsISBN: 9780989346924 50. Kellert, S.; Heerwagen, J.; Mador, M. (2008)Biophilic DesignISBN: 9780470163344 Summary of the 50 Studies The 50 referenced studies from neurobiology, art research, epigenetics, architectural psychology, perception researc