Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-method investigation reveals positive impact of English learning on soft skills in undergraduates, suggesting curricular enhancements.
: This paper presents findings from an empirical investigation into the relationship between English Language Learning (ELL) and soft skills development among undergraduate students in Nanded, Maharashtra. A mixed-method study was conducted with 350 undergraduate students drawn from five colleges affiliated with Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University (SRTMU) during the academic year 2025–26. Quantitative data were gathered through a validated structured questionnaire measuring six soft skill domains—oral communication, written communication, critical thinking, teamwork, adaptability, and professional etiquette—on a five-point Likert scale. Qualitative evidence was collected through focused group discussions and interviews. Statistical analysis using independent samples t-test and Pearson correlation revealed that students enrolled in formal ELL courses scored significantly higher across all six soft skill domains compared to non-ELL peers (p < 0.05). English proficiency level showed a strong positive correlation with overall soft skill score (r = 0.74). The study highlights critical pedagogical implications for curriculum design in Nanded's higher education landscape and recommends systemic integration of communicative English programs across undergraduate curricula.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajurkar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: