Evaluates the selective cytotoxicity of MTX-cIBR in leukemia T cells, suggesting improved targeting methods for treatment.
The ICAM-1-derived cIBR peptide selectively binds to the I-domain of LFA-1, a receptor highly expressed on leukemia T cells; thus, the MTX-cIBR conjugate can be used to target methotrexate (MTX) to leukemic T cells and reduce its off-target toxicity. However, the uptake, biological mechanism, and selectivity of MTX-cIBR compared with unconjugated MTX remain unclear. Therefore, this study is aimed at evaluating the uptake, cytotoxicity, selectivity, apoptosis, cell cycle effects, and DHFR-related activity of MTX-cIBR in leukemia T cells compared with unconjugated MTX. MTX-cIBR exhibited cytotoxic activity comparable to MTX in LFA-1-expressing MOLT-4 cells but showed lower toxicity toward LFA-1-negative K562 cells, indicating improved selectivity. MTX uptake occurred through RFC and mFBP transport systems, whereas MTX-cIBR no longer depended on these pathways, suggesting altered cellular uptake after conjugation with cIBR by utilizing the LFA-1 receptor. Both compounds predominantly induced apoptosis with minimal necrotic cell populations. MTX induced S-phase arrest at lower concentrations and G2/M induced arrest at higher concentrations, whereas MTX-cIBR consistently promoted S-phase accumulation. In addition, MTX and MTX-cIBR downregulated the expression of DHFR, FPGS, and TYMS in MOLT-4 cells. Computational analyses further demonstrated that MTX exhibited lower binding free energy (ΔG) and greater binding stability toward DHFR than MTX-cIBR. These findings suggest that MTX-cIBR retains selective cytotoxic activity toward LFA-1-expressing leukemia T cells through altered cellular uptake and exhibits different interaction characteristics with DHFR compared with unconjugated MTX.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Werdyani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: