Randomized trial demonstrates superior behaviour prediction and interpretations in autonomous driving, suggesting improved safety and understanding.
Intelligent autonomous driving systems must not only predict the appropriate driving manoeuvre but also provide human-interpretable evidence that justifies the decision. However, existing methods typically address these objectives separately, leading to three practical limitations: multi-stage perception-to-language pipelines can propagate upstream perception errors into downstream explanations; post hoc saliency methods often produce pixel-level highlights that are difficult to interpret semantically; and decoupled decision and explanation modules cannot guarantee that the explanation reflects the same scene evidence used for behaviour prediction. In this paper, we propose a unified framework that jointly performs vehicle behaviour prediction and human-centric interpretation from a shared visual backbone. Specifically, a hierarchical Swin Transformer encodes the driving scene into a sequence of spatial tokens, which are processed by two complementary branches. The first branch, termed the Object Selection Module (OSM), learns a compact scene-level semantic representation through query-guided cross-attention, while the second branch extracts a small set of class-agnostic object-centric tokens without requiring bounding-box or segmentation supervision. These two representations are subsequently integrated by a Semantic–Object Fusion (SOF) module based on scaled dot-product attention, residual connections, and a feed-forward network. The behaviour prediction head operates on the fused representation, whereas the interpretation head leverages the semantic representation through a skip connection to preserve decision-relevant context. For surround-view perception, learnable per-camera embeddings are introduced to maintain viewpoint identity with negligible additional parameter cost. Furthermore, a compact language model fine-tuned via Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) generates fluent, label-conditioned natural-language justifications. Extensive experiments on two public benchmarks, BDD-OIA and nu-AD, demonstrate that the proposed framework consistently delivers superior performance and provides effective, human-readable interpretations of driving decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhahri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: