Examines urban morphology impact on ecosystem conditions, suggesting essential insights for land-use management.
In the context of dynamic environmental changes, accurate geospatial information is fundamental for evidence-based decision-making in land-use planning. As urban areas undergo rapid structural transformations, characterizing their spatial morphology becomes essential for assessing ecosystem conditions and identifying pressure points within the urban–rural gradient. Drawing on the indicators for ecosystem condition and pressure recommended by the Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Services (MAES) framework, reflecting their trends, this study presents a methodology for comprehensive geospatial mapping of urban and peri-urban morphology, using the Functional Urban Area (FUA) of Burgas, Bulgaria, as a case study. The approach enables multi-scale spatial analysis (regional and local), integrates the structure and functions of urban ecosystems, and reveals the spatial heterogeneity of complex socio-economic systems. At the regional level, ecosystems within the FUA were identified using the national land-use/land-cover database. At the local level, within the city of Burgas, urban morphology was classified by combining building and land-cover types into 14 distinct urban morphological zones (local climate zones—LCZs) using high-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based orthophotos. This precise spatial data allowed for a detailed assessment of the balance between pervious and impervious surfaces within each LCZ. By integrating Google Earth Engine (GEE) data, the appropriate conditions and pressure indicators in the case study are assessed. Regional ecosystem pressure is effectively captured through the spatial distribution of the Final Pressure Index (IPr). Concurrently, the Urban Ecosystem Performance Index (UEPI) highlights sharp spatial polarization, with critical stress concentrated in the industrial and port zones of the urban core. The results provide policy-makers and stakeholders with critical insights into current pressures and environmental changes in urban and peri-urban ecosystems, offering a robust foundation for evidence-based management and climate change adaptation strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Semerdzhieva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: