Assesses dark sky park suitability in urban areas, suggesting new conservation strategies.
Rapid urbanization has intensified artificial light at night (ALAN) and reduced access to natural dark sky environments. Dark sky parks provide a potential spatial approach for nighttime environmental protection, ecological conservation, and astronomical recreation. This study develops a constraint-based suitability assessment framework for urban dark sky park site selection and applies it to Wuhan, China. Multi-source geospatial data were integrated into a 1 km × 1 km evaluation grid. The AHP–Delphi method was used to determine indicator weights, while land cover constraints were introduced to exclude artificial surfaces from candidate evaluation areas. Weighted overlay analysis, sensitivity analysis, continuous patch screening, and dark sky quality verification were then conducted. The results show that (1) artificial light visibility (ALV) and cloudless days (CVD) are the most important indicators, with weights of 0.328 and 0.250, respectively; (2) 29.38% of the evaluation units are classified as most suitable or more suitable; (3) the spatial pattern of highly suitable areas remain relatively stable, with Jaccard overlap rates of 73.65% and 87.09% under alternative weighting scenarios; and (4) continuous patch screening identifies Caidian and Yangda as priority candidate areas. Further verification using the Bortle Scale, a nine-level classification of night darkness, shows that the Caidian patch reached Bortle class 4 and National Astronomical Observatories (NAOC) dark sky class 1, indicating stronger practical feasibility for dark sky park development. The proposed framework provides a methodological reference for integrating dark sky protection, land use feasibility, and urban planning in metropolitan regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: