Introduction This study aimed to assess the user experiences of radiography students and healthcare radiation professionals regarding an X-ray scatter application that uses augmented reality (AR) to present X-ray scatter maps on mobile devices. Methods A descriptive qualitative and quantitative study design was employed in two phases. Participants used the application either during the development phase (phase-1, n=4) or as part of radiation protection training related to their studies or professional practice (phase-2, n=100). Subsequently, participants took part in a thematic interview (phase-1) or completed an anonymous questionnaire (phase-2). The largest participant groups in the second phase were radiography students (n = 45), radiographers (n = 44), and physicians (n = 9). Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results Based on the first phase of the study, modifications were made to the application's user interface. In the second phase, the majority of responses to Likert-scale questions addressing the application's technical performance, visual appearance, and educational value were favourable. Overall, 91% and 87% of respondents either agreed or somewhat agreed with the statements "The app helped me conceptualise the behaviour of X-ray scatter" and "The app is a valuable addition to traditional radiation protection training", respectively. Similarly, 53% and 57% of respondents either agreed or somewhat agreed with the statements "The app worked as I wanted it to" and "The app was easy to use", respectively. Conclusion Most respondents considered the application a valuable addition to traditional radiation protection training. With further development, its usability could be improved and a better focus on radiation protection training across different radiology specialties could be achieved. Implications for practice These findings support the use of AR-based applications as supplementary tools in radiation protection training for healthcare students and professionals.
Ylimaula et al. (Thu,) studied this question.