Demonstrates structural identifiability of gravitational parameters in the QDL, highlighting uncertainty implications for mass decomposition.
This paper develops the gravitational parameter μ = GM as a structurally identifiable and closure-stable observable within the Quantized Dimensional Ledger (QDL). In the Newtonian two-body problem, the observable trajectory depends on Newton’s gravitational constant G and the gravitating mass M only through their product μ = GM. Parameter pairs with the same product generate the same acceleration field and the same ideal two-body trajectories for the same initial data. Thus μ labels the identifiable equivalence class of gravitational parameter pairs, while G and M are not separately identifiable from orbital reconstruction without an external calibration channel. The paper proves this structural-identifiability result and then applies it as a public GM-ledger audit. The IAU nominal solar mass parameter μ⊙N = 1.3271244 × 10^20 m^3 s^-2 is an exact nominal conversion constant. Decomposing it through the CODATA value G = 6.67430(15) × 10^-11 m^3 kg^-1 s^-2 gives M⊙N = 1.9884098707 × 10^30 kg. Because this decomposition uses G, the inferred mass inherits the relative standard uncertainty of G, producing u(M⊙N) approximately 4.37 × 10^25 kg, or about 7.32 Earth masses. This is not a new measurement of the solar mass and not a new gravitational field equation. It is a structural audit of representation. The mathematical result is that orbital dynamics identifies μ = GM as the operational gravitational scale. The metrological result is that decomposing M = μ/G incurs a quantifiable uncertainty cost. The QDL interpretation is that μ = GM is a closure-stable gravitational observable with dimensional class L^3F^2, while G and M are decomposition-dependent factors unless independently constrained. The paper builds on the closure-deficit theorem by giving a concrete, numerical, source-anchored example of closure-stable representation and compensator accounting. It argues that a decomposition of a closure-stable observable is QDL-admissible only when the decomposition channel is explicitly represented. In this case, the compensator is the calibration and uncertainty status of G.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James D. Bourassa (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: