Prospective cohort study examines biomarker changes and clinical outcomes in chronic pain rehabilitation, suggesting predictive markers.
Background: Chronic pain is a multifactorial condition for which interdisciplinary multimodal rehabilitation is guideline-recommended, yet the biological mechanisms underlying treatment response remain incompletely understood and validated predictive biomarkers have not been established. Objective: This exploratory prospective cohort study examined clinical outcomes and circulating biomarker changes, encompassing the endocannabinoid system (ECS), inflammatory mediators, stress-regulatory markers, and metabolic parameters, in 410 patients with chronic pain of predominantly musculoskeletal etiology undergoing a standardized five-week rehabilitation program. Materials and Methods: Pain intensity and affective pain were assessed at baseline and end of rehabilitation; global performance of treatment (GPT) was additionally recorded. Serum analyses included anandamide (AEA), 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), IL-6, cortisol, IGF-1, BDNF, and leptin. Biomarker-outcome associations were examined via multiple regression analyses adjusted for demographics and biological and clinical confounders. Results: Statistically significant reductions were observed in pain intensity (−0.785 points, NRS; p < 0.001) and affective pain (−0.750 points; p < 0.001). IL-6 was associated with pain outcomes across time points. Higher baseline 2-AG independently predicted lower end-of-rehabilitation pain intensity, affective pain, and more favorable GPT. Greater AEA reductions were associated with favorable GPT. Conclusions: Baseline 2-AG emerges as a candidate predictor of treatment response, with lower pre-treatment levels potentially reflecting reduced stress-adaptive capacity, supporting inclusion of ECS markers in future controlled biomarker studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meinzer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: