Meta-ethnography synthesizes patient and practitioner views on menstrual problem consultations, suggesting improvement areas.
Past research indicates suboptimal primary care communication surrounding menstrual problems. This meta-ethnography synthesized qualitative research on patient and primary care practitioner perspectives to advance understanding of consultation dynamics. Menstrual problems included menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, or gynecological conditions (e.g., endometriosis). Searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, citation, website) yielded 30 included articles. Synthesized findings revealed complex shared concepts between patients’ and practitioners’ perspectives: varying attitudes toward and discussions about menstrual problems and patients, alongside tensions in expectations, roles and knowledge sharing. Empowering patients and practitioners to improve communication in these areas could enable more effective primary care menstrual problem consultations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Read et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: