Delving into Agile methods in construction projects through a meta-synthesis approach

The construction industry operates in a volatile and uncertain environment, creating a critical need for management paradigms that enhance adaptability. While Agile Project Management (APM) is increasingly proposed as a solution, the literature remains fragmented, lacking a holistic and prioritized view of its core components. To address this gap, this study employs a novel dual-method approach. First, a rigorous meta-synthesis of 33 qualitative studies was conducted, leading to the development of a comprehensive framework comprising 4 macro-dimensions (Process-Operational, Human-Cultural, Technological-Technical, Strategic-Managerial) and 27 distinct components. Second, Shannon entropy analysis was applied to objectively quantify and prioritize these components based on their emphasis across the literature. The results yield a weighted, evidence-based model, revealing a predominant focus on the Technological-Technical dimension (40% weight), followed by Human-Cultural (25%), Strategic-Managerial (20%), and Process-Operational (15%). This prioritization highlights a potential imbalance in current discourse and practice, suggesting that technological enablers may be overemphasized at the expense of human and strategic factors. The study's primary contribution is a decision-support tool that moves beyond narrative review to offer researchers and practitioners a validated hierarchy of agile factors, guiding strategic investment and implementation focus for successful agile transformation in construction.