Finds banks reduce lending more after social attacks, indicating a unique credit supply response.
Existing literature provides insufficient evidence on how non-economic shocks affect bank lending. Using social attack incidents as an exogenous shock, this study finds that banks significantly reduce their lending after experiencing shocks. Difference-in-differences estimations reveal that during years with a higher incidence of social attacks, banks with greater risk aversion reduce their lending to a larger extent than their less risk-averse counterparts. These findings reveal a distinct credit supply channel for non-economic shocks that is separate from the channels driven by economic uncertainty or political violence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tongxin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: