Quasi-experimental study compares a digital escape room and worksheet instruction on engagement and learning gains in first-year Chinese learners.
This study examined how a low-cost digital escape room operationalized guided discovery learning for instruction in Chinese semantic radicals. Using a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design, the study compared a Google Forms-based escape-room condition with a worksheet-based guided instruction condition across four beginning Chinese classes over two semesters. Ninety-nine first-year learners participated. Both conditions used the same radicals, character examples, instructional sequence, grouping structure, and guided-induction questions, but differed in interaction design. The escape-room condition used sequential progression, answer-contingent feedback, and collaborative problem solving, whereas the worksheet condition allowed flexible pacing, explicit teacher support, and organized review. Data included an orthographic awareness test, an engagement survey, and focus-group interviews. Results showed significant learning gains in both groups, with greater improvement in the escape-room condition. Engagement findings suggested that the two formats supported participation differently: the escape room especially promoted peer interaction and shared reasoning, while the worksheet condition supported clarity, learner-controlled pacing, and reflective review. Findings suggest that digital escape rooms are not inherently superior, but that specific design features can shape distinct engagement pathways in Chinese character instruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tingting Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: