Cross-sectional study estimates work impairment and costs in allergic rhinitis and asthma, indicating the impact of disease control.
BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis and asthma can impair work productivity. OBJECTIVE: To validate a daily work productivity visual analog scale (VAS work), comparing it with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire plus Classroom Impairment Questions: Allergy Specific (WPAI+CIQ:AS). We also aimed to quantify how allergy control relates to work impairment and indirect costs. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the MASK-air® app. Patients recorded daily VAS and weekly WPAI+CIQ:AS responses. We calculated correlations between VAS work and WPAI+CIQ:AS outcomes. Mixed-effects regression models assessed associations between disease control, measured by the Combined Symptom-Medication Score (CSMS) and the electronic daily asthma control score (e-DASTHMA), and VAS work. Indirect costs were estimated using the human capital approach, applying VAS-based productivity losses to country-specific wage distributions. RESULTS: VAS work correlated strongly with the WPAI+CIQ:AS, with Spearman coefficients ≥0.70 for total work impairment and presenteeism. Each 1-point increase in CSMS and e-DASTHMA was associated with mean 0.97 and 0.79-point increases in VAS work, respectively. In poorly controlled days, the estimated daily indirect cost based on CSMS ranged from 12.50 US$ PPP (P25-P75=5.60-26.70) in Brazil to 129.90 US$ PPP (P25-P75=80.40-199.40) in Iceland. Based on e-DASTHMA, daily estimates ranged from 9.30 US$ PPP (P25-P75=3.70-21.50) in Brazil to 101.90 US$ PPP (P25-P75=51.20-172.40) in Iceland. CONCLUSION: VAS work is a valid simple daily measure of work impairment due to rhinitis and asthma. CSMS and e-DASTHMA can be used to estimate productivity losses attributable to poor disease control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vieira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: