Retrospective study compares recurrence patterns and efficacy of RT and CRT in cT2N0 laryngeal cancer, indicating benefits of CRT.
Objectives : T2N0 laryngeal cancer has been recommended to be treated with radiotherapy(RT)as the standard treatment in clinical guidelines ; however, chemoradiotherapy(CRT)is often employed in clinical practice.The objective of this study was to investigate the difference in treatment efficacy and recurrence patterns between RT and CRT in patients with cT 2 laryngeal cancer.Patients and Methods : This multicenter, retrospective study spanning 13 hospitals in northern Japan (2014-2023)investigated treatment efficacy and recurrence patterns between radiotherapy(RT)and chemoradiotherapy (CRT)for cT2N0 laryngeal cancer.Results : We analyzed 377 patients treated with RT or CRT.RT patients were significantly older, with fewer supraglottic and more glottic tumors(p<0. 05) .Recurrence sites/rates were similar.CRT improved RFS(86. 9% vs. 74. 2%, p<0. 05) , but local control rates were comparable(CRT : 89. 9%, RT : 82. 8%, p=0. 19) .Conclusion : For cT2N0 laryngeal cancer, adding chemotherapy to RT improves RFS.Since LC was unchanged, this RFS gain likely results from reducing regional nodal recurrence and/or distant metastasis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Konomi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: