Retrospective study evaluates long-term safety and efficacy of nintedanib in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease, suggesting stability in lung function.
Randomized trials have demonstrated that nintedanib is beneficial for Systemic Sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) with an acceptable safety profile. We evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of nintedanib in a real-world SSc-ILD cohort. Medical records of SSc patients receiving nintedanib for newly diagnosed fibrotic or progressive ILD between 2020 and 2025 in our center were retrospectively reviewed. Forced vital capacity (FVC%) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO%), were recorded 12 months before and 12/24/36 months after nintedanib initiation and compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Safety analyses included all treated patients; efficacy analyses excluded patients initiating immunosuppression simultaneously with nintedanib. Fifty-one patients (41 female; 34 diffuse SSc; median age and disease duration of 53 and 6 years, respectively) received nintedanib for a median of 33 months (range 4-60). Diarrhea was the most frequent adverse event leading to dosage reduction in 31% and permanent discontinuation in 14% of patients, respectively. No additional safety signals emerged in patients receiving mycophenolate (n = 18), tocilizumab (n = 14), rituximab (n = 1), mycophenolate plus tocilizumab (n = 5) or mycophenolate plus rituximab (n = 2). FVC% and DLCO%, that had declined significantly during the preceding year, remained stable after nintedanib initiation in 23/35 patients with median FVC changes of + 1% and - 3% and median DLCO% changes of -2% and - 4% after 24 and 36 months, respectively), including patients on reduced dosage. Real-world data show that nintedanib seems to stabilize pulmonary function in progressive SSc-ILD, even at reduced doses, during 3 years of follow-up in about half of patients, without safety concerns when combined with biologic agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panopoulos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: