PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 2026Foods0 citationsOpen Access

OPTIFARM: Benchmarking YOLO Architectures for Location-Robust Potato Quality Detection

View Full Paper
TPTadej PeršakMSMarko SimoničJHJernej Hernavs

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various YOLO architectures for automated potato quality detection across different locations.
  • Constructed an RGB-based optical inspection system using commodity hardware.
  • Collected a dataset of 19,805 manually annotated instances across 1361 images from two distinct Slovenian farm locations.
  • Conducted benchmarking of 25 YOLO model configurations under a cross-location evaluation protocol.
  • All models achieved strong in-distribution performance (F1 ≥ 0.906).
  • Cross-location external F1 scores varied from 0.792 to 0.918, with yolo26_l achieving the best performance (F1 = 0.918, mAP@0.5:0.95 = 0.816).
  • Feed detection was identified as the primary generalization bottleneck.

Abstract

Potato sorting in post-harvest processing relies heavily on manual visual inspection, which is physically demanding, subjective, and insufficiently scalable for modern packing lines. This study investigates the feasibility of a low-cost RGB-based optical inspection system for automated potato quality detection using deep learning-based object detection. A controlled imaging platform was constructed using commodity hardware, and a dataset of 19, 805 manually annotated instances across 1361 images was collected from two geographically distinct farm locations in Slovenia. A systematic benchmark of 25 model configurations spanning five YOLO architecture families—YOLOv8, YOLOv9, YOLOv10, YOLOv11, and YOLO26—was conducted across three practical quality classes (Edible, Feed, Rotten) using a strict cross-location evaluation protocol in which models were trained on one location and tested on a completely unseen second location. All models achieved strong in-distribution performance (F1 ≥ 0. 906), but showed considerable variation under cross-location conditions, with external F1 ranging from 0. 792 to 0. 918. The yolo26ₗ configuration achieved the best cross-location performance (F1 = 0. 918, mAP@0. 5: 0. 95 = 0. 816, ΔF1 = 0. 029), demonstrating that transferable representations are achievable under a standard supervised training protocol. Per-class analysis identified feed detection as the primary generalization bottleneck. The results confirm that affordable RGB-based sorting systems are technically feasible and highlight cross-location evaluation as an essential protocol for assessing real-world deployment readiness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peršak et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2e45d5b1cc60ccdea8ab53https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15122121
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper