Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective study examines associations between girls' psychopathology and caregiver strain over one year, suggesting dynamic impacts.
Caregiver strain influences service utilization and engagement. Prior work—largely centered on boys—shows that attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) strongly contribute to strain; however, less is known about these relations in girls. This study examined associations between youth psychopathology symptom dimensions (ADHD, ODD, borderline personality features [BPF], a problem more commonly identified in girls) and caregiver strain facets (objective, subjective internalized, subjective externalized, total strain) among caregivers of 10- to 15-year-old girls ( N = 197, M age = 12.06), and whether these associations changed over one year. ADHD, ODD, BPF, and subjective externalized strain increased over time (Δ M range = 0.03-0.36, 95% CIs [0.02, 0.50], p ≤ .007, d = 0.06-0.15), whereas total and subjective internalized strain decreased (Δ M range = − 0.19 to − 0.05, 95% CIs [-0.21, − 0.03], p < .001, d = 0.08-0.24). All psychopathology dimensions were positively associated with each caregiver strain facet, concurrently and longitudinally. Linear mixed models revealed positive, facet-specific main effects: ADHD, ODD, and BPF on total and subjective internalized strain; ADHD and BPF on objective strain; and ODD and BPF on subjective externalized strain. A Time × ADHD interaction indicated a weakening association between ADHD and objective strain over time ( b = − 0.24, 95% CI [-0.43, − 0.05], p FDR = 0.022), whereas Time × ODD interactions indicated strengthening associations with total, objective, and subjective externalized strain ( b range = 0.25-0.27, 95% CIs [0.05, 0.48], p FDR ≤ 0.032). Findings underscore domain-specific and developmentally dynamic associations between youth psychopathology and caregiver strain in families of adolescent girls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alacha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: