Retrospective cohort study shows TAPAD lowers complications in infected necrotizing pancreatitis, suggesting a better approach.
Background: Infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) requires effective drainage management. We introduce a novel technique, Trocar-Assisted Percutaneous Abscess Drainage (TAPAD), for direct placement of a double-lumen irrigation-suction tube and compare it with conventional 2-stage drainage. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included INP patients treated with the 2-stage method (n=98) or TAPAD (n=88). Outcomes included subsequent surgical requirements, complications, mortality, inflammatory markers, and ICU length of stay. Results: TAPAD significantly reduced the need for subsequent surgical intervention (OR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.16-0.82; P =0.02), abdominal bleeding (OR=0.41, 95% CI: 0.20-0.85; P =0.02), and ICU length of stay (HR=2.76, 95% CI: 1.89-4.02; P <0.001). Patients in the TAPAD group exhibited lower inflammatory marker levels on days 7 and 14 postintervention. Conclusion: TAPAD represents a promising alternative to conventional 2-stage drainage, offering reduced complications and improved clinical outcomes in the management of INP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: