Autoethnographic reflections on youth engagement practices suggest insights for sociopolitical development support.
Grounded in a sociopolitical development framework, this paper describes youth critical action via three practices: play, performance and protagonismo . Play is an activity associated with normative developmental behavior that is often characterized as a form of entertainment, recreation, and exploration. Performance, on the other hand, is acting with intention to convey or express a meaningful message. Protagonismo , while similar to play and performance in that it involves agency, is a public expression by a political actor engaged in collective action. Through an autoethnographic approach, featuring my reflections from three case studies— Muñecas Negras , Children Making a Change (CMAC), and Sophie Cruz—I examine how these practices support youth critical action. I conclude with insights for how these practices can be leveraged to facilitate, support and sustain critical action in relation to youth sociopolitical development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jesica Siham Fernández (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: