Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines participant retention in breastfeeding intervention, indicating structural inequities affect outcomes.
Objective. To be effective and generalizable, research must include diverse populations representative of the intended beneficiaries. Among women with low income in the United States, 74.9% initiate breastfeeding, but only 47.5% continue to six months. This analysis examined how structural inequities, indicated by income, race, and ethnicity, affect participant retention in a breastfeeding intervention. Methods. Participants (N=250) enrolled in PROMPT, a longitudinal randomized text-based breastfeeding self-management intervention trial. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze retention over 24 weeks. Results. Overall retention was 72%. Dropout risk was significantly higher among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black participants (HR 2.86, p<.001), and among those with lower income (HR 2.61, p<.001). A three-factor model (including income, race/ethnicity, and age) was statistically significant overall (p=.0001), though individual predictors were not. Conclusion. Structural inequities may contribute to differential retention in breastfeeding trials, highlighting the need for equity-focused recruitment and retention strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LaPlant et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: