PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 14, 2026Advances in Public HealthOpen Access

The Equipment Paradox: Explaining Differential Personal Protective Equipment Adoption Patterns Through Injury Experience and Perceived Threat in Informal Sector Welders

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ABAbdoulie B. BadjieABAmadou Barrow

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Cross-sectional analysis reveals varied PPE compliance patterns in informal welders, suggesting targeted interventions.

Key Points

  • This research investigates patterns of personal protective equipment adoption and their predictors among informal sector welders.
  • Cross-sectional analysis of 271 welders in Brikama, The Gambia
  • Latent class analysis employed to identify PPE adoption profiles
  • Demographic and occupational injury predictors assessed using multinomial logistic regression.
  • Three PPE compliance classes were identified: 61.3% selective compliance, 29.5% universal compliance, and 8.9% moderate compliance.
  • Increased odds of universal compliance are associated with welders having ≤ 10 years of experience (adjusted OR = 0.21, p = 0.001) and older age (aOR = 1.05, p = 0.032).
  • Prior injury experience did not significantly predict PPE adoption class membership.

Cite This Study

Badjie et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2e4687b1cc60ccdea8b34bhttps://doi.org/10.1155/adph/8248068
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share