Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reveals the need for integrated evaluations of environmental and human outcomes, suggesting policy improvements.
Environmental and human well-being outcomes are closely linked, and evaluating them in isolation risks overlooking their interacting mechanisms. Interventions should be grounded in local socio-economic and ecological contexts, allow for continuous learning and adjustment, and prioritise inclusive, fair and equitable approaches. More rigorous, theory-informed evaluations that report on both environmental and human well-being are needed. Future research should also better integrate cost-effectiveness analyses from the outset and track long-term and equity-related outcomes. Using agile evaluation methods and remote-sensing data can help close evidence gaps and improve decision-making in complex and dynamic environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marion et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: