Cross-cancer analysis identifies structural protein roles in drug targeting, highlighting novel therapeutic avenues.
We present a structural pharmacology framework for cancer drug discovery based on perturbation analysis of multi-layer signaling networks. Across six cancer types (KRAS-NSCLC, CRC, PDAC, GBM, BRAF-melanoma, EGFR-NSCLC), we compute the delta-r of each signaling protein — the change in inter-layer Pearson correlation upon node removal — and classify proteins as structural dampers (delta-r > 0) or anchors (delta-r < 0). Two pre-registered null model tests reveal that raw delta-r contains a strong degree-dependent component. We remove it via z_δr(v) = [δr(v) − μ_null(v)] / σ_null(v), yielding a degree-corrected structural perturbation metric (z_δr). A pre-registered degree-independence test (DISC_CANCER_7, 4/4 confirmed) validates this: global Spearman r(degree rank, |z_δr| rank) = 0.24 across 94 protein-network pairs. Key findings: CDK4 emerges as a robust degree-corrected structural damper in PDAC (|z_δr| > 2.0 under both null types) despite ranking 10th of 16 by degree. SOS1 is the top structural damper in EGFR-mutant NSCLC (z_δr = +2.47, rank 12th of 15 by degree), identifying it as a high-priority structural target not highlighted by degree centrality. MEK1 switches regime across cancer types (damper in ODS cancers, anchor in BRAF-melanoma), a signal invisible to degree centrality and pharmacologically validated: MEK inhibitors show the largest dissociation vs. GBM (d = −0.62, p < 10⁻¹⁰) and vs. CRC (d = −0.19, p < 10⁻¹⁰). DAMPER-Essentiality Decoupling: structural damper status predicts pharmacological vulnerability but not CRISPR essentiality. SOS1 (top damper in KRAS-MT LUAD, z_δr = +4.184) is not CRISPR-essential (d = +0.522, p = 0.29), while KRAS is (d = −1.336, p = 0.0002). Replicated in EGFR-MT LUAD (D23). Boundary conditions: z_δr predictions hold for co-pathway targets but fail for indirect activation (STAT3 via EGFR in GBM, p = 0.55) and state-dependent accessibility (MDM2 in PDAC, where ~70% TP53 mutation rate overrides structural signal). Reproducibility: Most validation experiments were pre-registered before data access. Analysis scripts, preregistrations, and dataset acquisition instructions are provided in the repository and paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vladi Ivanov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: