Employs improved simulations to explore flow dynamics and sediment transport near different dike types, indicating varying sediment mobility outcomes.
This study employs improved delayed detached eddy simulation to investigate coherent flow structures and bed shear stresses around unsubmerged straight and T-head spur dikes. Vortex topology identified using the λ2 criterion reveals a strong horseshoe-like vortex (HSV) for the straight spur dike, whereas the T-head spur dike produces a weakened HSV and a dominant upstream circulation that suppresses downflow and near-bed vorticity production. Probability density function (PDF) and joint PDFs of velocity fluctuations reveal three distinct instantaneous flow states for the HSV: back-flow, zero-flow, and intermediate-flow, for both configurations. Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) shows that for the straight dike, the first mode captures the mean-flow upwash and downwash induced by the HSV, while higher modes represent oscillations between the three flow states. In contrast, for the T-head dike, all dominant POD modes are associated with HSV oscillations. Analysis of the POD temporal coefficients shows that the zero-flow condition is more prevalent for the straight dike, whereas the back-flow condition dominates for the T-head dike. In the wake, both configurations generate shear-layer vortices that shed, merge, and form rib-like multiscale structures. Reduced vortex arching in the T-head dike keeps shear layer vortices more vertically oriented, suppressing near-bed horizontal vorticity and sediment entrainment. The bed shear stress distribution shows that the straight dike produces an order-of-magnitude greater probability of exceeding a critical sediment-mobility threshold than the T-head dike.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pradhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: